Wednesday, 28 September 2011

The Fur and the fury...

This is one of the biggest debates in the Fashion industry can wearing fur be an advantage or will it just cause fury within animal rights campaigners?

-Not long ago supermodels refused to wear it...but gradually fur has made it back onto the catwalk.

Fur has a eco-advantage of being biodegradable however on the other hand theres the ethical issue of furs coming from wild animals.

The british Fur label Hockley:
"There is no cruelty in the fur trade. We have invested £5Million in humane methods"

Globally fur sales have increased by 70 percent in the past decade. This doesn't tally with the view in the nineties that the fur was as dead as the animals making the coats. Surely this shows something is being done in the fashion industry and animals are not facing cruelty?
When a fur garment or product carries the OA label this says that the fur has came from a country where welfare regulations of standard governing are in force. The OA label was introduced by the fashion industry itself this gave them the power to clear and make a gradual disappearance of the fur farms that don't meet regulations and they can begin to make animal cruelty a distant memory.

- Advertising Harpers Bazaar in Vogue, Vogues publisher has a international policy of accepting fur advertising However the British version will still not feature Fur in its editorial pages.
Vogue "fur is part of fashion and we will continue to report on it'

So this is where the Eco situation comes in animal rights campaigns against is it right to kill a animal just for fashion?

"The animals being bred for their coats are in really awful conditions and don't have any kind of a life at all. I dislike fur both because of the cruelty to animals and because of the kind of social statement that it makes. It's absolutely disgusting how mink are raised just for some idiot to look fashionable and rich"- Stella McCartney

No comments:

Post a Comment